← Back to stories Close-up of saffron aloe vera gel jars with decorative saffron threads and petals on a wooden surface.
Photo by HYPE INTERNATIONAL on Pexels
钛媒体 2026-03-13

Yurongchu (玉容初) gambles on emotion-driven skincare: the saffron story is appealing, but consumers aren't buying?

A high-stakes pivot under pressure

Yurongchu (玉容初) has been cast as the rescue play for Liren Lizhuang (丽人丽妆), the once-dominant Chinese e-commerce beauty operator now facing a painful business-model shift. The parent company warned of a 2025 net loss attributable to shareholders of Rmb63.2–79.0 million, after revenues slid from Rmb4.155 billion in 2021 to Rmb1.728 billion in 2024 as key international clients including L'Oréal (欧莱雅), Lancôme (兰蔻) and Sulwhasoo (雪花秀) reclaimed control of their online shops. Can an emotion-driven niche brand turn a代运营 (agency) business into a sustainable branding business? The short answer: not yet.

Saffron narrative vs. market reality

Yurongchu repositioned from herbal repair to "emotion skincare," centring its claims on saffron (藏红花) as an active that—reportedly, according to SCI‑indexed studies—can downregulate genes linked to cortisol synthesis and therefore reduce stress‑related skin ageing. The flagship saffron essence oil is priced at Rmb374/30ml, noticeably above comparable market leaders, but traction is thin: Tmall data show the product sold only around 100 units in 30 days and the store lists ~2,000 recent purchasers, versus tens of thousands for some rivals. Is a biochemical story about cortisol too abstract for shoppers who buy what they can see and feel?

Trust, execution and cash constraints

The gap between concept and conversion is widened by execution and trust issues. Yurongchu uses third‑party contract manufacturing—reported to be Shanghai Youren Biotech—and was drawn into a product‑testing controversy after a popular review account alleged Sudan dye detections in multiple cosmetics; the brand said it had submitted samples for testing but has offered limited public updates, prompting refunds and consumer concern. Meanwhile competitors such as Winona (薇诺娜) have consolidated “skin‑level” trust through pharmacy channels and ingredient provenance, leaving Yurongchu to invest heavily in education at a time when Liren Lizhuang’s cash reserves and investor patience are stretched thin.

The Yurongchu experiment illustrates a broader problem facing Chinese beauty operators: channel disruption and the return of brand sovereignty have forced legacy shops to become brands, but building durable consumer belief in a novel scientific narrative takes time, evidence and spotless execution. With lofty marketing spend, shrinking gross revenues and only a thin runway of working capital, the question for Liren Lizhuang is blunt—how long will the market wait for the saffron story to turn into sustainable sales?

Policy
View original source →