← Back to stories From above of circuit boards of modern smartphones placed in plastic box in electronics factory
Photo by Andrey Matveev on Pexels
IT之家 2026-05-22

Hands-on with Trump’s T1 phone: no longer touting “Made in America,” reportedly a modified HTC U24 Pro

Foreign press finds the marketing changed and the hardware familiar

Foreign media who obtained hands‑on time with the Trump T1 phone — sold by Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) — report that the device no longer prominently advertises “Made in America” on its packaging or marketing. It has been reported that multiple outlets found the exterior, camera layout and software behaviour closely match an existing Taiwanese design, leading to estimates the T1 is a modification of the HTC (宏達電) U24 Pro rather than a wholly home‑built handset.

What reviewers saw — and what was removed

Reviewers noted physical and UI similarities to the U24 Pro: camera island shape, button placement and firmware fingerprints that point to a common OEM platform. The absence of explicit “Made in America” branding contrasts with earlier promotional claims from TMTG and cuts to the core public message behind the phone’s launch — a product pitched as a patriotic, US‑sourced alternative in the politicized smartphone market.

Supply chains and politics meet branding

Why does this matter? For Western readers: “Made in America” has been positioned as a political selling point by the company and its supporters. But modern smartphone supply chains are global, with design, components and assembly often split across Taiwan, China and other countries. It has been reported that sourcing from established Taiwanese ODMs or using off‑the‑shelf designs can undercut nationalist claims and expose the product to scrutiny over supply chains and trade policy, especially amid heightened US‑China tech tensions.

Practical fallout

If the reported link to HTC’s design is confirmed, TMTG may face reputational questions from buyers who expected a domestically produced device, and analysts will watch whether regulatory or consumer‑protection scrutiny follows. For now, the hands‑on reports raise a simple question: can a repackaged handset satisfy a politically charged promise? Many critics and observers appear unconvinced.

Smartphones
View original source →