← Back to stories Top view of a desk with cut-out letters spelling 'sorry', scissors, and a laptop.
Photo by alleksana on Pexels
IT之家 2026-03-26

Logitech China apologizes after Douyin promo used language that sparked public outrage

Statement and findings

Logitech China (罗技中国) issued a public apology after a promotional short video posted by the “Logitech G Official Flagship Store” (“罗技 G 官方旗舰店”) on Douyin used the line “我一降价,还不是像狗一样跑过来” — literally, “I cut the price, and aren't they running over like dogs?” — prompting swift backlash. The company said it was “deeply shocked and pained,” offered a sincere apology to users, and vowed to uphold strict brand standards and player trust.

Logitech China said the Douyin storefront is operated under authorization by Shanghai Baishide Electronics (上海百事得电子有限公司). It has been reported that the company’s internal investigation found an employee of that operator bypassed Logitech China’s marketing-material review process and published the content without approval. Logitech China called the post a serious violation of its brand guidelines and said it will “take this as a warning” and refocus on product experience and service.

Context and fallout

The incident underlines the reputational risks foreign tech and gaming brands face in China when local partners or social-media posts go wrong. Douyin, ByteDance’s short-video platform, and Sina Weibo amplify controversies quickly; the topic reportedly topped Weibo’s trending list under “Logitech insulted consumers” at 21:11. Will a prompt apology and tighter controls be enough to stop the damage? That remains unclear, and it has been reported that Logitech has not yet released details on any disciplinary actions against the operator’s staff.

For Western readers: this is not a trade- or sanction-related dispute, but a reminder that messaging missteps in China can trigger rapid public anger and scrutiny from regulators and consumers alike — a sensitive environment where brands must manage local partners and content very carefully.

SmartphonesPolicy
View original source →