← Back to stories Factory worker in a hard hat watches molten metal pouring at an industrial site.
Photo by Bence Szemerey on Pexels
凤凰科技 2026-03-25

ASML (阿斯麦) manufacturing employees strike at noon over reported 1,700-job cut

Strike begins

It has been reported that manufacturing employees at ASML (阿斯麦) staged a noon strike to protest the company's plan to lay off roughly 1,700 workers. Chinese outlet ifeng reported the action as a coordinated stoppage in assembly and production lines, with workers demanding the company rescind the cuts and enter talks with labor representatives. Reportedly, the demonstration was timed to disrupt peak operations and draw public attention.

Details and company response

Reports say the walkout affected multiple shifts, though the scale and exact locations have not been independently verified. It is not clear whether ASML has publicly commented on the strike; it has been reported that company spokespeople did not immediately respond to media inquiries. The number cited—1,700 jobs—has been presented as the headcount targeted by the company's internal restructuring plans.

Why it matters

ASML is the Dutch maker of critical photolithography equipment used to produce advanced semiconductors, and any disruption at its factories reverberates through global chip supply chains. For Western readers: ASML supplies the EUV (extreme ultraviolet) machines that firms such as TSMC and Samsung rely on for the most advanced nodes. The layoffs and the strike come amid a cyclical downturn in chip demand and tighter export controls that have reshaped industry investment and growth plans.

Implications

What happens next could matter for labor relations in a strategically vital industry. A prolonged stoppage would complicate delivery schedules already pressured by geopolitical tensions and trade restrictions between China, the United States and Europe. For now, it has been reported that negotiations and further actions remain possible as workers press for clarity and management weighs operational and regulatory risks.

Policy
View original source →