← Back to stories A deliveryman in a green jacket holding an eco-friendly food package outside a restaurant.
Photo by ROMAN ODINTSOV on Pexels
凤凰科技 2026-03-25

Having Spent Nearly 80 Billion in the Takeout War, What is Alibaba (阿里) Really After?

The bill and the battlefield

It has been reported that Alibaba (阿里) poured nearly 80 billion yuan into China's cut‑throat food delivery war — a campaign of subsidies, merchant deals and logistics investment that reshaped how millions order meals. The headline number is staggering. But the money didn't simply buy meals; it bought market access, merchant relationships and tens of millions of daily users who now habitually open platforms tied to Alibaba's ecosystem.

Not just market share — infrastructure and data

Why spend so much on what looks like a low‑margin business? Because food delivery sits at the intersection of payments, local logistics and consumer habits. By backing Ele.me (饿了么) and linking it to Alipay and Cainiao logistics, Alibaba has been building last‑mile capabilities and first‑party data that feed its New Retail strategy. Reportedly, the subsidies were as much about locking in users and merchants as about defeating rivals such as Meituan (美团). Control of local commerce funnels orders, payment flows and behavioral data into Alibaba's broader ecosystem — valuable for targeted advertising, merchant services and cross‑selling cloud and financial products.

Regulation, profitability and the real exit strategy

That strategy carries risks. Heavy subsidy wars drew regulatory attention in Beijing, and Chinese authorities have pushed platforms to stop “disorderly” subsidies and curb monopolistic behaviour. Profitability has lagged while the market consolidates. So what is Alibaba really after? Likely a durable, vertically integrated local services network: payments, logistics, merchant SaaS and consumer data that make its core commerce and cloud offerings stickier and harder for rivals to unbundle.

A geopolitical and competitive backdrop

For Western readers, the story is also about how domestic policy shapes tech giants differently in China. Unlike Silicon Valley’s VC-driven growth playbooks, Chinese platforms face explicit state nudges on competition and social stability. Alibaba’s spending spree can be read as a defensive‑offensive move — fend off Meituan at home, embed services into everyday life, and create a domestic bulwark resilient to external trade or tech frictions. Whether the nearly 80 billion yuan will translate into long‑term advantage remains the central question for investors and regulators alike.

E-Commerce
View original source →