← Back to stories Close-up of a factory production line with yellow components being assembled.
Photo by Cọ Sơn Thanh Bình on Pexels
虎嗅 2026-05-26

iQiyi (爱奇艺) under fire — now reportedly mobilising 100,000 “AI workers” as it races for a listing

iQiyi (爱奇艺) has been slammed by users and commentators for low-quality, AI-driven content. Reportedly, the Baidu (百度)-backed streaming platform has now deployed—or branded—a force of some 100,000 “AI workers” as part of a renewed push to go public, according to reporting by Huxiu. The claim has prompted fresh questions about content quality, platform gaming and the ethics of algorithmic scale.

What it has been reported that the company did

It has been reported that the 100,000 figure refers to an extensive system of AI tools and automated accounts used to generate content, seed engagement and reduce human costs. Critics accuse iQiyi of flooding its service with machine-produced shows, summary clips and moderators—sacrificing editorial standards for cheap volume. Is this an efficiency play or a way to dress up metrics ahead of a listing? Reportedly the move is explicitly tied to an effort to improve financials and user figures for prospective investors.

Context for Western readers

iQiyi is one of China’s largest streaming services, often compared to Netflix but operating inside a very different regulatory and political environment. The platform grew out of Baidu and has weathered a wave of domestic scrutiny over content, antitrust and data practices. Chinese regulators are also moving quickly to set rules for generative AI and online content, and geopolitical tensions have made cross-border listings and audits more fraught. That matters to investors: a home-grown surge of AI-produced content could invite both tighter oversight at home and skepticism abroad.

What’s at stake

If the Huxiu reporting is accurate, iQiyi’s bet on mass-produced AI workforces risks reputational damage and regulatory pushback at a sensitive moment for Chinese tech listings. For users, the question is straightforward: do they want more quantity or better curation? For regulators and investors, the calculus is different — and already shifting as Beijing tightens rules on algorithm transparency and content responsibility.

AI
View original source →