← Back to stories A young woman in a green dress celebrating amidst balloons and confetti holding a champagne bottle.
Photo by www.kaboompics.com on Pexels
虎嗅 2026-03-26

As American Warplanes Fly Over Iran, This South Korean Rich Second Generation Quietly Opens Champagne

A contrarian bet pays off

As U.S. warplanes streaked over Iran and the Strait of Hormuz teetered toward closure, Ga-Hyun Chung (郑佳贤) — heir to Sinokor Shipping (长锦商船) — reportedly raised a glass. While geopolitical tensions choked a quarter of seaborne oil flows, Sinokor went the opposite way: buying and long-leasing virtually every available very large crude carrier (VLCC) on the market. The result is a sudden, dominant market position that is turning floating tankers into “sea-borne ATMs,” with daily hire rates surging into the high six figures.

Scale and mechanics

It has been reported that, according to Veson Nautical and other industry trackers, Sinokor spent more than $2.5 billion to buy about 35 VLCCs by January and had control of roughly 150 VLCCs by late February. VLCCs typically carry 2 million barrels of oil and, crucially, can act as floating storage when onshore tanks are full or blocked — a strategic asset when a chokepoint like Hormuz is threatened. Baltic TD3C freight rates hit a record roughly $486,000 per day in early March and some fixtures reportedly topped $697,000; a year earlier daily rates averaged under $70,000.

Who is pulling the levers?

Sinokor began as a Sino–Korean venture in 1989 and transformed into a diversified shipping group under Chung’s family. Ga-Hyun Chung, the son of long-time chairman Chung Tae-sun, has been portrayed by Korean media and former colleagues as intensely private and hands‑on. He reportedly uses encrypted messaging for deal-making, favors a militarized management style, and — in anecdotes making their way through industry circles — likes to arm‑wrestle partners. It has also been reported that Sinokor sold off large container assets to free cash for the rapid VLCC build‑out, moving the company from regional container lines toward dominance in oil tanker ownership.

Geopolitics and risks

There is money to be made in a crisis. But there are also geopolitical and regulatory risks. The bump in earnings stems directly from disruptions tied to the Iran standoff; if sanctions widen, insurers and charterers may avoid ships linked to contentious routes or owners. It has been reported that, in the pool of non‑sanctioned, freely deployable spot capacity, Sinokor alone may account for nearly 40% — a market share that raises questions for Western energy buyers, freight markets, and regulators alike. Will the balance of power in tanker markets remain with one rapidly expanded owner, or will policy and risk aversion re‑shape where oil actually sails?

Policy
View original source →