← Back to stories A close-up view of a chessboard with intricately designed metal chess pieces in focus.
Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko on Pexels
虎嗅 2026-04-05

Why the U.S. sided with Israel: Cold War chess, regional leverage and enduring utility

Cold War roots, not merely kinship

The clearest reason the United States became Israel’s chief backer was strategic, not sentimental. In the early Cold War the Soviet Union briefly backed Israel’s founding and supplied arms through Czechoslovakia; when Moscow then pivoted to Egypt, Syria and other Arab states Washington suddenly found itself with no reliable local partner in a region that mattered for oil and global balance-of-power politics. Who could check Soviet influence in the eastern Mediterranean and the Arab world? Israel. Simple question: if you needed a reliable foothold in a hostile region, what would you choose? A small, militarised, Western-oriented state with a motivated security sector looked a lot more useful than distant promises of neutrality.

From French planes to U.S. lifelines

France supplied Israel’s early advanced weaponry after Western hesitation, helping it win the 1967 Six-Day War — a victory that reshaped Middle Eastern borders and perceptions. But alliances shifted again: after France’s post‑1967 arms embargo, Washington moved in. The 1973 Yom Kippur War was the turning point. When Israel’s front nearly collapsed, the U.S. organized a massive, decisive airlift of weapons and munitions; that intervention helped pull Egypt out of the Soviet camp and institutionalised American support for Israel.

Aid, industry and intelligence: why support stuck

Since the 1970s U.S. military aid to Israel has been large and predictable, and it flows back into American defence industry coffers through weapons purchases. That dynamic—strategic assistance that also sustains domestic industrial jobs—helps explain sustained bipartisan backing in Washington. It has been reported that private Jewish donations in the early years, including a large gift attributed to the Rothschilds, helped arm the nascent state; such claims remain contested in specifics. Reportedly, Israel’s intelligence reach in the Arab world—aided by its Arabic‑speaking citizens—has also given Washington unique regional insight it lacks, reinforcing operational cooperation beyond headline diplomacy.

From historical contingencies to contemporary debates

What began as Cold War realpolitik has hardened into decades of institutional ties: intelligence-sharing, arms sales, and coordinated actions against common rivals such as Iran. The arrangement raises recurring questions for U.S. foreign policy—about regional stability, the use of proxy partners, and how much strategic benefit justifies political costs at home and abroad. Huxiu’s narrative traces these contingencies; many of its anecdotal details are reported rather than independently verified, but the broad arc—cold‑war contingency turned permanent alliance—remains the most persuasive explanation for why Washington has sided with Israel “at every turn.”

Policy
View original source →